Friday, October 08, 2010
[IWS] CRS: SOUTHWEST BORDER VIOLENCE: ISSUES IN IDENTIFYING AND MEASURING SPILLOVER VIOLENCE [24 August 2010]
IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
Congressional Research Service (CRS)
Southwest Border Violence: Issues in Identifying and Measuring Spillover Violence
Kristin M. Finklea, Coordinator, Analyst in Domestic Security
Jennifer E. Lake, Section Research Manager
Celinda Franco, Specialist in Crime Policy
Chad C. Haddal, Specialist in Immigration Policy
William J. Krouse, Specialist in Domestic Security and Crime Policy
Mark A. Randol, Specialist in Domestic Intelligence and Counter-Terrorism
August 24, 2010
http://opencrs.com/document/R41075/2010-08-24/download/1013/
[full-text, 46 pages]
Summary
There has been a recent increase in the level of drug trafficking-related violence within and
between the drug trafficking organizations in Mexico. This violence has generated concern
among U.S. policy makers that the violence in Mexico might spill over into the United States.
Currently, U.S. federal officials deny that the recent increase in drug trafficking-related violence
in Mexico has resulted in a spillover into the United States, but they acknowledge that the
prospect is a serious concern.
The most recent threat assessment indicates that the Mexican drug trafficking organizations pose
the greatest drug trafficking threat to the United States, and this threat is driven partly by U.S.
demand for drugs. Mexican drug trafficking organizations are the major suppliers and key
producers of most illegal drugs smuggled into the United States across the Southwest border
(SWB). The nature of the conflict between the Mexican drug trafficking organizations in Mexico
has manifested itself, in part, as a struggle for control of these smuggling routes into the United
States. Further, in an illegal marketplace—such as that of illicit drugs—where prices and profits
are elevated due to the risks of operating outside the law, violence or the threat of violence
becomes the primary means for settling disputes.
When assessing the potential implications of the increased violence in Mexico, one of the central
concerns for Congress is the potential for what has been termed “spillover” violence—an increase
in drug trafficking-related violence in United States. While the interagency community has
defined spillover violence as violence targeted primarily at civilians and government entities—
excluding trafficker-on-trafficker violence—other experts and scholars have recognized
trafficker-on-trafficker violence as central to spillover. When defining and analyzing changes in
drug trafficking-related violence within the United States to determine whether there has been (or
may be in the future) any spillover violence, critical elements include who may be implicated in
the violence (both perpetrators and victims), what type of violence may arise, when violence may
appear, and where violence may occur (both along the SWB and in the nation’s interior).
Currently, no comprehensive, publicly available data exist that can definitively answer the
question of whether there has been a significant spillover of drug trafficking-related violence into
the United States. Although anecdotal reports have been mixed, U.S. government officials
maintain that there has not yet been a significant spillover. In an examination of data that could
provide insight into whether there has been a significant spillover in drug trafficking-related
violence from Mexico into the United States, CRS analyzed violent crime data from the Federal
Bureau of Investigation’s Uniform Crime Report program. The data, however, do not allow
analysts to determine what proportion of the violent crime rate is related to drug trafficking or,
even more specifically, what proportion of drug trafficking-related violent crimes can be
attributed to spillover violence. In conclusion, because the trends in the overall violent crime rate
may not be indicative of trends in drug trafficking-related violent crimes, CRS is unable to draw
definitive claims about trends in drug trafficking-related violence spilling over from Mexico into
the United States.
This report will be updated as circumstances warrant.
Contents
Introduction ...............................................................................................................................1
The Southwest Border Region and the Illicit Drug Trade Between the United States and
Mexico ...................................................................................................................................2
Demand for Drugs in the United States..................................................................................3
Supply of Illegal Drugs from Mexico ....................................................................................4
Mexican Drug Trafficking Organizations...............................................................................5
Partnerships in the United States .....................................................................................9
Activities ......................................................................................................................10
Relationship Between Illicit Drug Markets and Violence ........................................................... 11
What Is Spillover Violence? ......................................................................................................12
Characteristics of Spillover Violence...................................................................................13
Who May Be Implicated in Violence.............................................................................13
What Type of Violence May Arise.................................................................................15
When Violence May Appear..........................................................................................15
Where Violence May Occur ..........................................................................................16
Challenges in Evaluating and Responding to Spillover Violence................................................17
Complexity of the Issue.......................................................................................................17
Defining Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................18
Measuring the Problem .......................................................................................................19
Is There Spillover Violence? ...............................................................................................19
Analysis.......................................................................................................................19
Conclusion...............................................................................................................................24
Figures
Figure 1. Drug Routes Within Mexico and at the United States-Mexico Border ...........................7
Figure 2. U.S. Cities Reporting the Presence of Mexican Drug Trafficking Organizations............8
Figure 3. Violent Crime Rate in Selected MSAs ........................................................................22
Figure 4. Violent Crime Rate in Selected Southwest Border MSAs............................................23
Figure A-1. OCDETF Cases Referred to the USAOs, by Federal Agency ..................................40
Figure A-2. OCDETF Case Filings and Convictions ..................................................................41
Tables
Table 1. U.S. Illegal Drug Seizures Along the Southwest Border .................................................5
Appendixes
Appendix. Selected U.S. Efforts and Issues ...............................................................................26
________________________________________________________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.
****************************************
Stuart Basefsky
Director, IWS News Bureau
Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell/ILR School
16 E. 34th Street, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Telephone: (607) 255-2703
Fax: (607) 255-9641
E-mail: smb6@cornell.edu
****************************************