Thursday, May 27, 2010
[IWS] KLI (Korea): EVALUATION OF KOREA'S ACTIVATION POLICY AND DIRECTION FOR DEVELOPMENT
IWS Documented  News Service
  _______________________________
  Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
  School of Industrial & Labor Relations--------  Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
  Cornell University
  16 East 34th Street, 4th floor----------------------  Stuart Basefsky
  New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director,  IWS News Bureau
  ________________________________________________________________________
Korea  Labor Institute (KLI)
e-Labor  News No. 97
Issue  paper
Evaluation  of Korea's Activation Policy and Direction for Development∗
Deok  Soon Hwang∗∗
http://www.kli.re.kr/kli/html_eng/08_mail/webzineboard/upfile/e_97.pdf
[full-text,  39 pages]
Introduction
This  paper reviews the significance to Korea of activation policies that have  recently
been  adopted around the world and investigates what conditions are required if such  policies are
to  be implemented effectively in Korea.
Many  aspects of Korea's unemployment-benefit system resemble those of an  activation
policy.  Among these, the requirement that unemployment-benefit recipients register as a
job-seeker,  the use of profiling systems to categorize recipients and individual action  plans (IAP),
and  the obligation of recipients to periodically visit public employment-service  agencies and
engage  in job-seeking activities show Korea to be applying stronger activation  policies than other
OECD  countries. One exception is the fact that unlike other OECD countries, Korea  does not
have  a system that forces recipients to participate in active labor market programs  when they
receive  unemployment benefits for a certain period (OECD, 2007).
Paradoxically,  it is difficult to conclude that Korea's unemployment-benefit system does
in  fact contribute to the activation of unemployed workers. This paper seeks to  investigate why
such  inconsistencies occur as well as the possibility and conditions for successful  activation
policies  in Korea, with a focus on the implementation process and delivery systems for
employment  services.
The  organization of this paper is as follows. First, it examines the concept of  activation
policies.  It is necessary to clarify the concept of activation policies used in this  paper because a
multidimensional  approach that covers not only specific programs but also changes in the
ideological  goals of a welfare state is possible. Next, the paper looks at the key  characteristics of
the  Korean labor market and their significance from the viewpoint of activation.  The paper then
discusses  the characteristics of key welfare programs and labor market policies that can  be
viewed  in relation to activation policies. Next, it examines how Korea's current
employment-support  services can be evaluated from the viewpoint of activation policies by
focusing  on employment-service delivery systems. Finally, the results of the study are  put
together  to discuss the possibility and conditions for the success of activation  policies in Korea.
*  This paper was originally presented at the seminar "Activation Policies  and the Performance of Employment Services," organized by the Korea  Ministry of Labor and the OECD, in cooperation with the Korea Labor Institute,  in Seoul in November 4, 2009.
**  Senior Research Fellow, Korea Labor Institute (Email: hds@kli.re.kr).
  
  
________________________________________________________________________
This information is provided  to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of  Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for  Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for  the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies,  workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines  as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate.  The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University,  the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and  should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the  original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the  day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested  that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented  News Service. 
  
  
****************************************
  Stuart Basefsky                    
  Director, IWS News Bureau                 
  Institute for Workplace Studies 
  Cornell/ILR School                          
  16 E. 34th Street, 4th Floor              
  New York, NY 10016                          
                                        
  Telephone: (607) 255-2703                 
  Fax: (607) 255-9641                         
  E-mail: smb6@cornell.edu                    
  ****************************************