Wednesday, December 23, 2009
[IWS] ADB: [INDIA] SURVEYS OF INFORMAL SECTOR ENTERPRISES --SOME MEASUREMENT ISSUES [December 2009]
IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
Asian Development Bank (ADB)
ADB Economics
Working Paper Series
No. 183 | December 2009
[INDIA] Surveys of Informal Sector Enterprises— Some Measurement Issues
by Kaushal Joshi, Rana Hasan, and Glenita Amoranto
http://www.adb.org/Documents/Working-Papers/2009/Economics-WP183.pdf
[full-text, 37 pages]
Abstract
The informal sector represents an important part of the economy and the labor
market in many countries, especially developing countries. Measurements of the
informal sector are of intrinsic interest in their own right and contribute toward
exhaustive measures of gross domestic product (GDP). Considering that the
informal sector provides employment for income creation to a large number of
poor and contributes significantly to the GDP of many developing countries,
collecting statistics through surveys for accurate measurement of output, net
surplus, and value added is critical for national accountants, other users, and
for researchers working on policy-related issues. As most of the informal sector
enterprises do not maintain business accounts, the survey responses depend
highly on the recall by the respondent and the skills of the interviewer. Thus a
very important aspect of the surveys of informal sector enterprises is the design
of the survey questionnaire and the details to be captured in data collection
in order to accurately measure the characteristics of these enterprises. The
details sought in the survey questionnaire have implications on the accuracy
of data and hence in the measurement of expenditure, receipts, profits, and
gross value added (GVA) of these enterprises. In this paper we examine the
differences in the measures of (i) profits of an enterprise derived from a detailed
set of questions on incomes and expenses, versus profits obtained through a
single direct question; and (ii) GVA obtained using the production approach as
the difference of output and intermediate consumption from a detailed set of
questions on incomes and expenses, versus GVA using the income approach by
asking a few questions on factor incomes, and a single direct question on profits.
We use data from the 56th round survey of unorganized manufacturing conducted
by the National Sample Survey Organization of India during the period July
2000–June 2001. We also examine if the differences vary with the characteristics
of the enterprises, and suggest further empirical research to develop suitable
tools for providing accurate measurements of informal sector enterprises.
Contents
Abstract v
I. Introduction 1
II. Measurement of Informal Sector 2
III. NSS Surveys on Unorganized Manufacturing 4
IV. Data Description 5
V. NSS 56th Round Questionnaire 6
VI. Results of Data Review 9
A. Books of Accounts 11
B. Response Code 13
C. Informant 13
D. Enterprise Type 14
E. Size of Employment 15
F. Size of Plant and Machinery 15
G. Registration 16
H. Location of Enterprise 17
I. States 17
VII. Profits(derived) and Profits(direct): Profile of Enterprises 18
VIII. What do We Conclude from Above? 19
IX. Suggestions for Further Methodological Work 21
Appendix 23
References 29
________________________________________________________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.
****************************************
Stuart Basefsky
Director, IWS News Bureau
Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell/ILR School
16 E. 34th Street, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Telephone: (607) 255-2703
Fax: (607) 255-9641
E-mail: smb6@cornell.edu
****************************************