IWS Documented News INTERNATIONAL

IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________

 

Congressional Research Service (CRS)

 

Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and Its Role in U.S. Trade Policy

J. F. Hornbeck, Specialist in International Trade and Finance

Laine Elise Rover, Research Associate

October 7, 2011

http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/175967.pdf

[full-text, 16 pages]

 

 

Summary

Congress created Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) in the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to help

workers and firms adjust to dislocation that may be caused by increased trade liberalization. It is

justified now, as it was then, on grounds that the government has an obligation to help the

“losers” of policy-driven trade liberalization. In addition, TAA is presented as an alternative to

policies that would restrict imports, and so provides assistance while bolstering freer trade and

diminishing prospects for potentially costly tension (retaliation) among trade partners. As in the

past, critics strongly debate the merits of TAA on equity, efficiency, and budgetary grounds.

Nonetheless, TAA still appears to serve what is now a historically pragmatic legislative function:

it remains important for forging a compromise on national trade policy.

 

TAA was most recently expanded in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of

2009, although the higher funding levels and program enhancements expired on February 12,

2011, leaving TAA programs to operate at pre-ARRA levels until February 12, 2012, when all

TAA program authorizations are scheduled to expire. TAA program authorizations are set to

expire on February 13, 2012, and the 112^th Congress is taking legislative action to extend them.

 

Based on an understanding between House and Senate leaders, and the White House, a

compromise TAA reauthorization bill (H.R. 2832) is being considered as part of a deal for voting

on three implementing bills for the proposed free trade agreements (FTAs) with Colombia (H.R.

3078), Panama (H.R. 3079), and South Korea (H.R. 3080).

 

The TAA extension would reauthorize the workers, firms, and farmers programs through

December 31, 2013. TAA for communities would be repealed, considered duplicative of other

federal programs. Many, but not all, of the enhanced programs and funding levels contained in the

ARRA would be reauthorized, including extending benefits to services workers and firms, and

requiring expanded evaluation and reporting requirements on the programs. The provisions of the

bill would apply retroactively to the expiration date of the ARRA enhancements.

 

Congressional Democrats and the White House insisted that consideration of the three FTA

implementing bills be contingent upon passage of TAA reauthorization legislation. To

accommodate concerns on all sides over legislative procedure, an elaborate process was agreed to

that ensures consideration of the four bills within a relatively short time span. The House passed a

bill on September 7, 2011, reauthorizing the Generalized System of Preferences (H.R. 2832),

sending it to the Senate, where it was amended with TAA reauthorization. On September 22,

2011, the Senate agreed to the amended bill, 70-27, after which it was sent to the House. In

separate action, the House Ways and Means Committee favorably reported out all three FTA

implementing bills on October 3, 2011.

 

On October 6, 2011, the House Committee on Rules issued a closed rule covering all four bills.

Senate amendment to H.R. 2832 is expected to be taken up by the House on October 12, 2011,

along with implementing bills for the three FTAs. H.R. 2832, as amended, will be considered

under a rule that waives all points of order and allows for one hour of debate. The bill requires

simple majority to pass, and having already been agreed to in the Senate, House passage would

then allow it to be sent to the President for signature.

 

Contents

Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 1

TAA Programs and Rationale .......................................................................................................... 1

Antecedents to TAA......................................................................................................................... 3

The Randall Commission .......................................................................................................... 5

Early TAA Legislation............................................................................................................... 5

Trade Expansion Act of 1962 .......................................................................................................... 6

The Failure of TAA: 1963-1974 ...................................................................................................... 7

Trade Act of 1974 ............................................................................................................................ 8

The Trade Agreements Act of 1979 and the 1980s .......................................................................... 9

NAFTA and the Trade Act of 2002: TAA Expansion..................................................................... 10

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 and TAA Revision.................. 11

Reauthorization in the 112

th

Congress ........................................................................................... 12

Appendixes

Appendix. TAA Reauthorization, 1962-2011 ................................................................................ 13

Contacts

Author Contact Information........................................................................................................... 13

________________________________________________________________________

This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.

****************************************
Stuart Basefsky                   
Director, IWS News Bureau                
Institute for Workplace Studies 
Cornell/ILR School                        
16 E. 34th Street, 4th Floor             
New York, NY 10016                        
                                   
Telephone: (607) 262-6041               
Fax: (607) 255-9641                       
E-mail: smb6@cornell.edu                  
****************************************