Tuesday, October 25, 2011
[IWS] Mercer: HISTORIC SHIFT in EXECUTIVE REMUNERATION WORLDWIDE [June 2011]
IWS Documented News Service
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
Executive Remuneration Perspective: Trends in Executive Remuneration
Historic shift in executive remuneration worldwide [June 2011]
[full-text, 12 pages]
Press Release 5 October 2011
Global executive pay trends – Asian remuneration eroding West's ability to attract scarce talent
London, 5 October 2011
■Western pay restrained by fall out from financial crisis and weak economy
■Executive pay in Asia eclipsed Western Europe and catching up with North America
■Rapid growth, leadership shortages and inflation prompts concern over pay inflation in Asia
Increased pay restraint in Western Europe and North America, combined with economic growth in emerging markets, is pushing pay for executives in Asia beyond levels in the West, says Mercer. Executive pay in Asia has already passed European levels and is predicted by Mercer to pass the US within three years. However, the company has cautioned that inflationary drivers behind remuneration in Asia risk creating a bubble, fraying the link between pay and performance and distorting company salary structures.
According to Piia Pilv, an Amsterdam-based partner in Mercer's Executive Remuneration team, "Historically, executives in Western economies have been paid the most but the centre of gravity is moving inexorably east. In 2010, average executive salaries in Asia surpassed those in Europe and we anticipate that they will surpass those in the US by 2013."
"The trend is spread across many emerging economies; in the Middle East, for example, executive salaries have already caught up with those in Europe. Pay in Western economies is being restrained by poor economic growth and continued pay scrutiny in the wake of the financial crisis. Asia has been largely unaffected by these issues, so hasn't had the brakes applied to executive remuneration as much."
"We should remember that Asia is an attractive place to work for many executives and better pay is only one factor in attracting many Western executives to the region," continued Ms Pilv. "Companies in the West should review their remuneration policies to ensure that they can attract the best players to remain competitive on the global playing field."
Western European trends
The worldwide economic crisis has led to new regional and national rules and regulations that have dampened executive pay inflation. Large organisations are turning away from short-term incentives towards deferrals, long-term incentives (LTIs) and improved leadership development. Mercer has highlighted the changes in the financial services sector as indicative as it tends to be copied by other industry sectors. Broadly, organisations are attempting to balance risk and sustainability in their remuneration plans.
The intense pressure in countries such as the UK, Spain, Portugal and Germany, from regulators, the media, the public and shareholders is resulting in executive remuneration plans with closer ties to business performance and value creation. The ability to withstand external scrutiny is vital. There have been widespread reviews of, and reductions in, generous severance pay packages in countries such as Italy, for example. Executives in large organisations are well-qualified for international roles and, given the opportunities in Asia, remuneration plans are focused on retaining them.
"In the United Kingdom," says Mark Hoble, a partner in Mercer's UK Executive Remuneration team "Government pressure on financial services companies to demonstrate a stronger link between pay, performance and organisational risk continues. It's an effort to strengthen corporate governance and address the use of short term incentives (STIs) at the expense of long-term sustainability."
Changes to the UK's FSA Remuneration Code came into effect on 1 January 2011. The FSA directive originally applied to 29 organisations in the UK and now applies to 4,500 organisations, contributing to considerable frustration to those outside the financial services sector that the banking crisis has had a spillover effect on them.
More broadly, however, as part of their normal annual salary reviews, the vast majority of European organisations are increasing their executive salaries by an average of 2.5% in 2011 according to Mercer data. With this increase often being under the rate of inflation, the buying power of executives, like more employees, is being eroded.
In Canada and the US there is also intense scrutiny of executive pay. Shareholders, corporate governance advocates, legislators and regulators are demanding increased transparency in executive compensation programmes and stronger alignment of pay and performance. Management and compensation committees are under pressure to be responsive and accountable to stakeholders. More emphasis is being placed on rigorous pay-for-performance benchmarks, longer term equity holding requirements, claw-backs, and deferred bonuses in the financial sector. In the background, pay inflation is restrained with 2011 salary increases averaging around 3% in the US and Canada.
The picture is very different in Asia. In 2011, executive salaries in Asia increased by an average of 7%. Executive pay in the Asia Pacific region is increasing across the region, especially in China, India, Indonesia, Vietnam, the Philippines and Malaysia. Contributing factors include continued strong GDP growth, accelerating inflation and, crucially, a scarcity of executive talent. The exception is the struggling Japanese economy which is suppressing pay - keeping it below Western levels.
The limited talent pool in this executive employee group and the competition to attract and retain them is driving up pay in some sectors. This may prove unsustainable in the medium term but in the meantime, it is leading to the use of innovative methods of attracting and retaining staff. There is evidence of LTI plans that reward not just over three or four years, but perhaps over 10 years or 20 years and even up to retirement
In China, as mobility between local and multinational companies has increased, so the pay gap has narrowed. Companies in China are adopting many western European practices ensuring that executive compensation is measured. In India, strong growth of around 9% has increased staff mobility and pay. This has not been matched by increased performance or delivery, however, so greater scrutiny by boards and compensation committees on fair use of remuneration benchmarks, increased use of performance criteria and more clawback provisions, are likely.
Gulf Cooperation Council
Executive remuneration practices and standards across the six states (Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Oman, Qatar and Bahrain Gulf) are rapidly catching up with those in the rest of the world. Deferred bonus plans are being introduced and annual incentive programs are linked more closely with specific corporate and division/business unit performance measures. Mercer survey results are forecasting base salary increases in 2011 ranging from 6% to 7.5% which for many companies will be the first pay increase in two years.
According to Ms Pilv, "The overarching trend is a move towards better governance of executive remuneration, tighter association of pay with performance and greater use of long-term, rather than short-term incentives. Companies should ensure that they keep a sufficient component of the pay as variable and flexible so that they only pay for measurable performance, ensuring that total remuneration levels are sustainable over time".
Notes to Editors
An executive is defined as a member of the board or a country MD, or business unit head for a multi-national. Graphs are available on request. For a more detailed, country-by-country analysis of remuneration trends, please visit this webpage.
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.
Director, IWS News Bureau
Institute for Workplace Studies
16 E. 34th Street, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Telephone: (607) 262-6041
Fax: (607) 255-9641