Thursday, April 05, 2012
[IWS] CRS: INDUSTRIAL COMPETITIVENESS AND TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT: DEBATE OVER GOVERNMENT POLICY [13 March 2012]
IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
Congressional Research Service (CRS)
Industrial Competitiveness and Technological Advancement: Debate Over Government Policy
Wendy H. Schacht, Specialist in Science and Technology Policy
March 13, 2012
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL33528.pdf
[full-text, 15 pages]
Summary
There is ongoing interest in the pace of U.S. technological advancement due to its influence on
U.S. economic growth, productivity, and international competitiveness. Because technology can
contribute to economic growth and productivity increases, congressional attention has focused on
how to augment private-sector technological development. Legislative activity over the past 25 or
more years has created a policy for technology development, albeit an ad hoc one. Because of the
lack of consensus on the scope and direction of a national policy, Congress has taken an
incremental approach aimed at creating new mechanisms to facilitate technological advancement
in particular areas and making changes and improvements as necessary.
Congressional action has mandated specific technology development programs and obligations in
federal agencies. Many programs were created based upon what individual committees judged
appropriate within the agencies over which they had authorization or appropriation
responsibilities. However, there has been recent legislative activity directed at eliminating or
significantly curtailing many of these federal efforts. Several programs have been terminated and
the budgets for other initiatives have declined.
The proper role of the federal government in technology development and the competitiveness of
U.S. industry continues to be a topic of congressional debate. Legislation affecting the research
and development (R&D) environment has included both direct and indirect measures to facilitate
technological innovation. In general, direct measures are those which involve budget outlays and
the provision of services by government agencies. Indirect measures include financial incentives
and legal changes (e.g., liability or regulatory reform; new antitrust arrangements). As the
Congress develops its appropriation priorities, the manner by which the government encourages
technological progress in the private sector again may be explored and/or redefined.
Contents
Technology and Competitiveness .................................................................................................... 1
The Federal Role in Technology Development ............................................................................... 1
Legislative Initiatives and Current Programs .................................................................................. 5
Increased R&D Spending.......................................................................................................... 5
Industry-University Cooperative Efforts ................................................................................... 7
Joint Industrial Research ........................................................................................................... 8
Commercialization of the Results of Federally Funded R&D................................................... 9
A Different Approach?................................................................................................................... 12
Contacts
Author Contact Information........................................................................................................... 12
________________________________________________________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.