Tuesday, May 01, 2012

[IWS] CRS: U.S. SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC MANUFACTURING: INDUSTRY TRENDS, GLOBAL COMPETITION, FEDERAL SUPPORT [27 April 2012]

IWS Documented News Service

_______________________________

Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach

School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies

Cornell University

16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky

New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau

________________________________________________________________________

 

Congressional Research Service (CRS)

 

U.S. Solar Photovoltaic Manufacturing: Industry Trends, Global Competition, Federal Support

Michaela D. Platzer, Specialist in Industrial Organization and Business

April 27, 2012

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42509.pdf

[full-text, 33 pages]

 

Summary

Every president since Richard Nixon has sought to increase U.S. energy supply diversity. In

recent years, job creation and the development of a domestic renewable energy manufacturing

base have joined national security and environmental concerns as rationales for promoting the

manufacturing of solar power equipment in the United States. The federal government maintains

a variety of tax credits, loan guarantees, and targeted research and development programs to

encourage the solar manufacturing sector, and state-level mandates that utilities obtain specified

percentages of their electricity from renewable sources have bolstered demand for large solar

projects.

 

The most widely used solar technology involves photovoltaic (PV) solar modules, which draw on

semiconducting materials to convert sunlight into electricity. By year-end 2011, the total number

of grid-connected PV systems nationwide reached almost 215,000. Domestic demand is met both

by imports and by about 100 U.S. manufacturing facilities employing an estimated 25,000 U.S.

workers in 2011. Production is clustered in a few states, including California, Oregon, Texas, and

Ohio.

 

Domestic PV manufacturers operate in a dynamic and highly competitive global market now

dominated by Chinese and Taiwanese companies. All major PV solar manufacturers maintain

global sourcing strategies; the only U.S.-based manufacturer ranked among the top ten global cell

producers in 2010 sourced the majority of its panels from its factory in Malaysia. Some PV

manufacturers have expanded their operations beyond China to places like the Philippines and

Mexico. Overcapacity has led to a significant drop in module prices, with solar panel prices

falling more than 50% over the course of 2011. Several PV manufacturers have entered

bankruptcy and others are reassessing their business models. Although hundreds of small

companies are engaged in PV manufacturing around the world, profitability concerns appear to be

driving consolidation, with ten firms now controlling half of global cell and module production.

 

The Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission are investigating

allegations that U.S. producers have been injured by dumped and subsidized imports from China.

If significant duties are ultimately imposed, U.S. production could become more competitive with

imports, but the cost of installing solar systems might rise. On the other hand, a number of federal

policies that have helped to spur domestic demand for solar PV products have expired or reached

their funding limits. These include the 1603 cash grant program and the advanced energy

manufacturing tax credit; S. 591, which would extend the credit, has been introduced in the 112th

Congress. Under current law, the Investment Tax Credit for PV systems will sunset at the end of

2016.

 

The competitiveness of solar PV as a source of electric generation in the United States will likely

be adversely affected both by the expiration of these tax provisions and by the rapid development

of shale gas, which has the potential to lower the cost of gas-fired power generation and reduce

the cost-competitiveness of solar power, particularly as an energy source for utilities. In light of

these developments, the ability to build a significant U.S. production base for PV equipment is in

question.

 

Contents

Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 1

Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Manufacturing .......................................................................................... 3

Historical Overview................................................................................................................... 4

The Manufacturing Process....................................................................................................... 5

Production Locations................................................................................................................. 9

Domestic Production ............................................................................................................... 10

U.S. Solar Manufacturing Employment .................................................................................. 14

Global Production Shifts................................................................................................................ 15

U.S. Trade in Solar Products.......................................................................................................... 19

Allegations of Dumped and Subsidized Solar PV Products from China .......................... 20

Domestic Content.............................................................................................................. 21

U.S. Exports ...................................................................................................................... 21

U.S. Government Support for Solar Power ................................................................................... 22

Advanced Energy Manufacturing Tax Credit (MTC) ....................................................... 23

DOE Loan Guarantee Programs........................................................................................ 23

Investment Tax Credit (ITC) ............................................................................................. 25

SunShot and Other Department of Energy Initiatives ............................................................. 26

Conclusions.................................................................................................................................... 26

 

Figures

Figure 1. PV Value Chain ................................................................................................................ 8

Figure 2. U.S. PV Installations and Global Market Share ............................................................. 10

Figure 3. U.S. Cell/Module and Polysilicon Production Facilities................................................ 12

Figure 4. Domestic Solar Industry Employment Trends ............................................................... 14

Figure 5. Average Price of PV Cells and Modules ........................................................................ 16

Figure 6. Annual Solar Cell Production by Country...................................................................... 17

 

Tables

Table 1. Cell and Module Production in the United States............................................................ 10

Table 2. Selected Recent PV Facility Closures.............................................................................. 12

Table 3. Selected New or Planned PV Plants................................................................................. 13

Table 4. Top PV Cell Manufacturers by Production ...................................................................... 18

Table 5. U.S. Imports of Solar Cells and Modules, Select Countries ............................................ 20

Table 6. 1705 Loan Guarantees for Solar Generation and Manufacturing Projects ...................... 24

Table A-1. Solar PV Manufacturers Receiving a 48C Manufacturing Tax Credit......................... 28

 

 

________________________________________________________________________

This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.

 






<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?